AREA 4:

The Instructional

and

Organizational Effectiveness

Indicators of Quality:

Curriculum

Instructional Design

Assessment

Educational Agenda

Leadership for School Performance

Community Building

Culture of Continuous Improvement and Learning

Committee Members:

Mrs. Diane Russell

Mrs. Donna Vercillo

Mrs. Jennie Wetmiller

Mrs. Melissa McWhorter

Mrs. Barbara D’Amato

With special guidance from:

Mrs. Vickie Guettler

82

Area 4: Analysis of Instructional and Organizational Effectiveness

The fourth area of the School Improvement Planning Process requires St. Anastasia to analyze its instructional and organizational effectiveness. The purpose of this analysis is to identify both St. Anastasia’s strengths and limitations regarding the learning program currently utilized, and to ensure that these identified strengths and limitations are aligned with the school’s Mission Statement.

 

St. Anastasia School’s Mission Statement is: "The Saint Anastasia School and Church Community believe each student is a unique child of God, called to achieve excellence by nurturing the mind, body, and spirit in the image and likeness of God."

Not only does the school focus its attention on its mission statement as teachers plan daily lessons and teach students; faculty feel daily teachings are a shared responsibility within our community. The publication The Religious Dimension of Education in a Catholic School, from the Congregation for Catholic Education (Rome 1988), states "Everyone directly involved in the school is a part of the school community: teachers, directors, administrative and auxiliary staff. Parents are central figures, since they are the natural and irreplaceable agencies in the education of their children. And the community also includes the students, since they must be active agents in their own education."

 

Within the following pages of our School Improvement Plan an overview of the analysis of Area IV is provided. Information is gathered from the "Survey of Instructional and Organizational Effectiveness" and Indicators of Schools of Quality from NSSE. The survey was administered to each member of the faculty, support staff, and administration. A graphic overview of the results for the survey is provided on the following two pages.

In light of the survey results, we collected evidence pertaining to those areas of identified strengths, as well as those areas identified as limitations. A summary of these findings is provided on charts 4-1 and 4-2.

A summary of the priorities for improvement in Area IV is also provided under Analysis of the Overall Instructional and Organizational Effectiveness.

83

Summary of Strengths in Instructional and Organizational Effectiveness

And Supporting Evidence

 

Areas of Strength

Evidence

1. Vision, Mission, Beliefs and Goals

The school’s mission is to proclaim the gospel message, to build faith communities, to celebrate through worship and to serve others without distinction.

 

This strength earned the highest ranking on the NSSE/FCC survey.

The Mission Statement and Belief Statements clearly define the desire to build a faith- filled community

The teachers are role models for the students through their participation in the school masses as Eucharistic ministers, lectors and choir members.

There is school-wide participation in masses. Grades 2-8 attend weekly mass, and grades K-8 attend all school masses monthly.

The holiday programs ( Thanksgiving prayer service, Christmas play, The Living Stations ,and the Living Rosary) are other ways we celebrate as a school community.

Grades K-8 have a Patron Saint which they are looking to as role models.

The presence of a crucifix and statue of Mary in each classroom represents the Catholic faith.

Most teachers have prepared prayer areas in their classrooms for the students to use for daily prayers or special prayer intentions for themselves, family members, friends, or strangers in need.

86

Areas of Strength

Evidence

2. Vision, Beliefs, Missions and Goals

The school develops a shared vision, beliefs, and mission that define a compelling purpose and direction for the school.

 

This strength ranked high on the NSSE/FCC survey

All stakeholders shared in the development of the Mission and Belief Statements.

The faculty has representatives on the parish council, school advisory board, principal’s council, and the home and school association to insure strong communication among the school, parish, and community.

Every faculty member has contributed to the accreditation process.

The mission statement is posted in each classroom and is displayed in the school newsletter and parish bulletin.

Each Unit has a faculty member serving on a school committee (safety, spiritual, social, etc.)

87

Areas of Strength

Evidence

3. Curriculum

The school’s curriculum furnishes instruction in Catholic truths and moral values that are an integral part of the school program

This strength ranked high on the NSSE/FCC survey for Area IV.

The level of Student Achievement in Faith Formation scored at the fully competent level on the NSSE/FCC Survey of Seven Goals for Student Achievement in Area III of the SIP.

Comments on the open-ended response items support this strength.

All teachers are certified as religious educators by the Diocese after completing the Echoes of Faith Program.

The religion curriculum is developed at the Diocesan level with local teacher representatives serving on this curriculum committee.

Religion texts are updated on a six year cycle, and purchased from Sadlier (K-5) and Loyola (6-8).

88

Areas of Strength

Evidence

4. Instructional Design

Daily planning activities incorporate developmentally appropriate instruction in Catholic truths and moral values.

 

This strength ranked high on the NSSE/FCC survey.

There is daily prayer for grades PreK-8 in the morning, before lunch and at the end of the day.

Students participate in school liturgies both on a weekly and monthly basis. Many students are actively involved in the church as lectors, choir members, and alter servers.

The guardian angel program allows the students in grades 7 and 8 to serve as positive role models for students in grades K and 1.

The advisor program encourages the 7th and 8th grade students to serve others. Each advisor group selects a service project for service day. This program provides the students with a valuable service experience.

The school participates in service through the Thanksgiving Food Drive, Project Rice Bowl, Christmas Toy Drive, and

Project Clean Your Desk.

89

Areas of Strength

Evidence

5. Community Building and Communication

School leadership- pastors, principal, teachers, and parent advisory group- foster community building conditions within the school, and share responsibility for the mission of the school.

 

This strength ranked high on the NSSE/FCC survey.

Monday morning prayer and announcements for faculty keep teachers abreast of the week’s events.

Unit meetings allow for communication between teachers.

Faculty meetings allow for communication between grade levels and administration.

The email and voicemail systems assist teachers in communicating with other faculty members, administrators and parents.

The newsletter and monthly calendars are excellent information sources for the parents, faculty and staff.

Administrators meet monthly with the Home and School Association to collaborate.

The School Advisory Council of parents meets monthly with the pastor and principal to collaborate and share the leadership role.

The Mission and Belief Statements were developed by all stakeholders.

90

Summary of Limitations

And Supporting Evidence

 

Category Evidence
1a. Instructional Design - The instructional and assessment functions of the teaching and learning process are integrated to support data-driven instructional decision-making.

1b. Assessments – The student learning assessment system provides for the collection of a comprehensive and representative sample of student performance that is sufficient in scope to permit confident conclusions about student achievement and yield generalized results.

This item tied for lowest on the NSSE/FCC Survey for Area IV, although it was rated fully functional on the survey scale.

Open-ended responses on the Area IV Survey indicated improvement is needed in many areas of assessment.

Upon reviewing teacher testing materials, many assessments of student learning are not based upon the development of reasoning and problem solving abilities, demonstration of performance skills, and the creation of products. (authentic assessment)

Student assessment often fails to monitor student progress and improve student learning according to teacher surveys and discussion.

91

Areas of Limitation

Category Evidence
2. Professional Development- the school builds skills and capacity for improvement through comprehensive and ongoing professional development programs focused on the school’s goals for improvement. This item tied for lowest on the NSSE/FCC Survey for Area IV, although it was rated fully functional on the survey scale.

The school has not developed a shared professional development plan for teachers and teacher assistants.

The school community has not ensured that the focus of staff development is to improve student learning and instructional effectiveness, as noted on the survey.

The school has not maintained a constant and steady focus on improving student learning through improvement of instructional practices.

92

Category Evidence
3. Leadership for School Improvement- The school employs effective decision-making that is data driven, research based and collaborative.  

This item tied for second lowest on the NSSE/FCC Survey for level IV, although it was rated fully functional on the survey scale.

There is not a shared vision of successful student learning so that teachers, parents and students know what good performance looks like, based upon Area IV survey.

The school does not review and analyze national assessments for the purpose of curriculum planning and increasing student achievement.

The school does not use assessment data for planning student programs as noted on the open-ended survey.

There is little evidence of the school using assessment data to diagnose program and student weaknesses.

Teachers and assistants comment on the open-ended survey that there is a concern regarding the number of struggling students being accepted into St. Anastasia.

93

Areas of Limitation

Category Evidence
4. Leadership for School Improvement (Time)- Adequate time is available for teachers to participate in lesson planning and integrating professional development activities into their teaching and daily work with students. Based upon open-ended responses to the Area IV Survey, numerous teachers do not believe that they have enough planning time for their program.

A review of teacher schedules reveals that some teachers have only 20 minutes of planning time on certain days.

Teachers comment on the open-ended response survey, that there is little time to plan within curriculum departments, especially in the area of technology.

94

Areas of Limitations

Category Evidence
5. Leadership for School Improvement (Cleanliness and Technology Acquisition) The school provides skillful stewardship by ensuring management of the organization, operations, and resources of the school for a clean learning environment, and acquisition of technology hardware, and software. Teachers and teacher assistants state that the physical environment for learning should be cleaner and more hygienic. (open-ended survey)

Cleanliness and hygiene are topics of discussion at certain unit meetings as of late.

The need to incorporate more technology into teaching and learning, and the lack of sufficient hardware and software are mentioned numerous times by teachers and teacher assistants in the open-ended survey for Area IV.

95